Is Westernized Tragopan Better Than Modernized Hornbill?

I’m almost certain that there is hardly any educated person who has not heard or thought or talked about the impact of westernization in our society today, and rightly so. But it is disheartening to see that often westernization has been confused with modernization and vice versa. Obviously, one cannot be understood fully without the other. However, there is a thin layer of difference between westernization and modernization. It is true that “modernization,” commonly understood, was born in the west, but it is incorrect to attribute all aspects of modernization to the western worlds. Each society has evolved its own form and style of modernization with the passage of time, in certain cases distinct and distinguishable from that of the west. I’ll try to highlight some of my points here.

Let us take a brief tour to history and try to understand how modernism was born before we go into more details of westernization. We know that modern age was immediately preceded by feudal age. The question to be asked is ‘What led to this transition?’ On this, different people will have different things to say, but for the present purpose we will limit our discussion to what I feel is most relevant and worth considering; it concerns the notions of power and knowledge. By power, we mean mainly political power, the power to take decision, control and regulate the actions and activities of the people living in a society. People who exercise such power derive their authority from some source; and this brings us to the question of knowledge.


Feudalism, or feudal life and culture, was characterized by a strong appeal to faith. Metaphysical and religious belief systems were inevitable part of day-to-day feudal life. Let me explain this in more concrete terms: The Bible was the source of power not only for justifying the action of the people but also for regulating their actions and activities. It was the standard for judging the actions of the people – to say that an action was right or wrong, good or bad, worthwhile or useless etc. The power (authority) of the Bible was absolute. No one could even doubt it or question it. There was no provision for such inquisitive spirit in the feudal age. The Bible became the source and backbone of the Divine Origin Theory of kingship and of the state. This theory empowers the rulers to such an extent that no one can question the behavior or authority of the rulers! They were the representatives of god on earth. Their words were law and they were revered as the fountain of justice. To go even a little further, biblical knowledge was used to explain natural phenomena as well. Everything that happens is purposeful. Without reference to God or something mysterious or supernatural, no explanation was meaningful or adequate. This gave a lot of space for the few learned people with twisted minds to discriminate and exploit the common mass to the maximum. Common people were made to believe all kinds of tainted teachings blindly. The Bible was not accessible to the common people then; not until the arrival of Martin Luther in the 16 th century. So it used to be the case that knowledge and power were concentrated only in the hands of the privileged few, people belonging to the state or the church. The life of the common people was characterized by different kinds of obligations whereas the higher strata of people enjoyed maximum rights or liberty. There existed in any society a great divide between the rulers and the subjects. Simply put, people were not born equal. No wonder this age is also called in history as the Dark Age in Europe. Dark Age in a different cultural mask was also prevalent in the East, particularly in the Indian sub-continent. However, we will skip the Indian case here.

We will now come to modern age or modernism. Descartes, known as the Father of Modern Western Philosophy, a renowned 17th century French philosopher and mathematician, is known for his famous philosophic dictum: ” I think therefore I exist.” He was the first person to say that one’s existence can be proved only by thinking. Humorously put, a Cartesian would say that when one stops thinking one ceases to exist. To him, only thinking as such is indubitable. Descartes asserted that everything else can be doubted. That means not even the Bible or one’s own body is self-evident. The point to mark here is that Descartes introduced a rigorous reasoning method into knowledge seeking and knowledge acquisition activities. Nothing is to be accepted as knowledge without examination and subsequent validation.

Central to the idea of modernism, then, is reason. The source of power for the early modern age was reason as opposed to faith in the feudal age. Thus there was a shift of paradigm from faith to reason, from God-centeredness to human-centeredness. Man, not God, became the measure of everything. Reason became the main tool for acquiring knowledge. From then on, human actions and ideologies needed to be justified not in terms of Biblical principles but on the basis of humanistic principles. For instance, stealing is bad and condemnable not because the Bible says it is, but because it is harmful for peaceful social existence. Extreme belief in the power of human beings replaced the faith in God. A rainbow occurs not because God wants to show a miraculous sign of His benevolence to human kind but because of the laws of nature – laws of optics and other related theories. A natural phenomenon is mechanical in character following specific laws and not teleological in nature. The demand of the time was the urgent desire to discover such laws in nature, laws which can explain and predict natural phenomena. Discoveries of laws of nature obviously led to industrial revolution. Since then, there has been unceasing technological development till date. In other words, human actions were explained and justified in terms of humanist or enlightenment principles, and likewise natural events were explained and predicted in terms of laws of nature. If there was no theory to explain an action or event, then it was not accepted as valid knowledge. Thus, then as now, to have a law for explaining something is termed science. The gist is that ‘ to be modern is to be scientific.’ Modernization means theorization. Science became the epitome of knowledge. The term ‘science’ thus became the in thing in the academic circles of eighteenth and nineteenth century Europe. By the end of the nineteenth century, there was a trend to convert every academic discipline in social studies to social ‘sciences.’

Let us now do some thought experiments with this historical background in mind. It is said that the practice of terrace cultivation among the Nagas is highly scientific in nature. If so, the question is, ‘Is terrace cultivation a modern or a western practice?’ I wouldn’t part with this achievement of our forebears by attributing it to the westerners. The diet of the Japanese people is considered to be highly nutritious. Does it mean that it is scientific? Yes! Is it modern? Yes and, perhaps, no. “No” because it is ancient and “Yes” because it is scientific. But can we say that it is western? Definitely not! Again, is the principle of non-violence struggle for freedom, satyagraha, started by Gandhi against British colonial rule modern? Yes, because it happened in the twentieth century and the movement was not violent or barbaric. But was it western? I certainly doubt it! We do talk about folk or indigenous knowledge of medicine that are very ancient. But we can modernize this knowledge by interpreting them in terms of modern scientific tools or theories. But we would not speak of them as an act or process of westernization. It is worthwhile to note that scientificity or modernity has a universal appeal and is not confined to western culture or regional culture alone.

Not everything western even today is modern either. I mean, look at some of their dirty languages and their messy-horny-scanty dresses, especially those of the so-called celebrities who we are very apt to emulate! Such lifestyle is driven not by ‘necessity’ but often by reasons of sexual proclivity. How can we forget some of their music? They can be very disgusting. Their fast food life is not healthy at all (despite its attractive ads). It is sheer ignorance of the philosophies of the west, coupled with blind desire to imitate them, that actually resulted in the decadence of many of our ethos. Through various forms of mass media, especially Hollywood production, we only get to see their outer superficial world. We don’t know what really drives them. The point is, they are rich and we are not rich like them; their youth can afford to party, dress in style and drive expensive cars because they earn. How many of us, the Naga youths, earn money to enjoy? How many of us drive our own cars? Countable! It is indeed pitiful or rather painful to see some of our youths going to fish market in attires fit for a party at a star-studded hotel. We just don’t know when to start and when to quit the art of copying!

In the meantime, as seen above, we should also note that not everything about modernism is compatible with our social and religious beliefs and practices. Thus, any thinking religious person will not remain unperturbed if conclusions were to be drawn from the above reflections. Due to excessive belief in scientism and humanism, for instance, Darwinism and social ideologies have come to replace the creation theory and biblical values. To be known as an atheist among the intellectuals has even become fashionable in the universities and other centers for higher learning.

Formal system of modern education and Christianity are two forces that have come from the west to our society. They have come to stay, and they should, as a matter of fact, for our own good. If our society has to catch up with the fast changing world, it is imperative that we forego part of our traditional beliefs and practices to meet the demands of the time and at the same time embrace many promises and packages of the west. We should not be so worried about part of our cultures being transformed by the modern or western lifestyles. In saying this, I don’t mean that we should reject our culture in favor of modern or western culture totally. Rather, we should be more concerned about aping the outside cultures without really knowing their meanings and implications. We should be geared to encounter the western negative aspects of individualism, materialism, capitalism etc., which are almost alien to our cultures. These forces can be extremely harmful to our society as our societal structure is predominantly communitarian and spiritual (non-materialism). I am aware that in recent times, certain elements have come out in the open to criticize the impact of Christianization in our society. However, I would rather see our animistic beliefs and practices fade away than reject modern education and Christianity in the name of preserving our traditional ethos. On the contrary, I am convinced that we need these two things to enhance the quality of our present and future living and also to preserve and appreciate our past life (culture and tradition) better.

What follows naturally from the discussion above is that our immediate task should be to sharpen our knowledge of modern education so as to interpret and understand the western world better, which may, at the same time, help us to cope with the needs and desires of the fast changing world, the unstoppable age of globalization. I feel that our urgent concern should be to fill the communication gap between the west and the east, between foreign culture and our cultures. Otherwise, our cultures would soon dissolve into foreign cultures even without our realization, and our own cultures would, as a result, become things of historical interest only. We will thus lose our authenticity and originality. This will have adverse effect on our Naga identity, especially the upcoming generations. Finally, any talk on westernization vis-à-vis modernization would not be complete without involving issues and concepts such as individualism, materialism, capitalism, liberalism, or humanism and enlightenment, or even globalization and post-modernism, and for those who have are ultra current, post-post modernism or trans-modernism. But it is not practical to touch all these in such a short time and space. And, I’ve not even started to answer which of the two is preferable – a westernized trigopan or a modernized hornbill. A bold, adventurous reader and thinker would therefore certainly not end his or her reading here. I hope you are one!

 Venusa Tinyi

Rani Ma Gaidinliu – The legend

27th Jan. 2008

The projected image of Naga society was that cent-percent Nagas had been converted to Christianity by American and British missionaries, they were made to fight against Bharatiya government and they are anti-Hindu and anti-Hindi. My uncle late Ram Pyare Mall and my brother in law (Jijaji) Ram Chandra Singh and my elder sister have been doing business in Kohima from 1965 along with hundreds of people from my area.

I had been hearing similar opinion from them about Naga folk. I had been bearing several more myths which I find uneasy to put in media. With this Naga image in my mind I landed in Kohima immediately after declaration of national emergency by Indira Gandhi in June 1975. From day one, I started looking for such ‘wild’ Nagas as described by them. I read several books on Nagas written by J.P Mill, Hutton and Christian missionaries where Nagas were described as wild, savage, heathen and Satan worshippers.

In Kohima, my eyes were looking for such ‘savage’ Nagas but I have not found any such person so far. Instead, I found honest, hospitable, self-contended and hard working Nagas, of course, with immense anti-Indian and anti-Hindu hatred with very few exceptions.

It was during those days I saw a lady in full customary attire with two girls on left and right side holding her arms with police patrol with VVIsP honor on the occasions of republic Day and independence day celebrations in Kohima local ground. I got myself drawn towards her. I developed curiosity to know more about her. In the process, I met Ramkui Newmei, Abuan Kamei-her private secretaries and through them, I established intimacy with Rani Ma and Pou N.C Zeliang

In 1978, freedom of religion bill was to be presented by Om Prakash Tyagi MP for debate in parliament. The church was dead against this bill. A national protest day was observed by Churches on May 3′ 1978 in Nagaland, a very volatile and hostile situation was created and even Hindus were compelled to join the protest march. I was also one of them unwillingly holding a placard-“Pass the bill and divide the country”. But Rani Ma decided to write a letter to President and Prime Minister of Bharatvarsh in support of Tyagi’s freedom of religion. And she did this; this has been annexed in Asoso Yunuo’s book on Rani Maa. The national media highlighted this letter. During those days, the local weeklies like Nagaland times. (Editor-Kalu Datta), Ura Mail (Editor-Chalie Kevichusa), Kohima weakly and platform were published from Dimapur and Kohima. These weeklies criticized Rani Maa for supporting that anti-conversion bill. The Church was also criticizing her. The security was tightened. Haipou N.C Zeliang was worried for her safety and security. After fifteen days of publication of her letter to president and Prime Minister, the appreciation letters from different part of country started pouring in. During all those turbulent times, I found Rani Ma very calm and quiet. No worry, nothing of that sort, she successfully ventured to establish solidarity with the nation. She gave a message to the nation that all Nagas do not subscribe the secessionist demand of underground section, and that all Nagas were not Christian and not anti-Hindu

Again on second occasion, she was successful as emissary of Naga society in second world Hindu conference at Prayag (Allahabad) in January 1979, wherein five lakh Hindus Parishad (VHP). Rani Maa attended this conference. She was chief guest of women meet while Vijaya Raje Scindia, vice president of then Jana Sangh, Maha Devi Verma noted Hindi poetess, Anutai Baag-Veteran social worker and several other women were the dignitaries on the dals, RSS chief, VHP chief, Jana Sangh chief and world renowned Hindu leaders were sitting in VVIP gallery. Rani Maa told the five lakh strong Hindu assembly on the Sangam of river Ganga, Yamuna and Saraswati, “We Nagas uphold our Heraka (Hindu) faith and are for unity, integrity and sovereignty of the nation. The situation in Nagaland was very hostile and people were living in fear. Hindu society should come forward to redress the woes of Naga society”. After this, she traveled length and breadth of the country and addressed scores of meetings wherein she presented glorious history of Nagas. She also informed the nation about Angami braves of Khonoma and Haipou Jadonang who fought against British invasion for the freedom of Bharatvarsh. This inspired Hindu society to know more about Nagas and developed respect for Naga leaders like J. B. Jasokie, Vizol, Suisa, T. Sakhrie, Dr. Imkongliba, Dr. Hokishe Sema, Dr. S.C Jamir and others who stood for the sovereignty of the country. She bridged the gulf between Nagas and non-Nagas Hindus. She cleared many distorted picture of Naga society projected by hostiles with a view to wean away Nagas from Hindu society. There lies her greatness.

Jagdamba Mall, Kohima.

Sumi community Shishimi village clarifies

27th Jan 2008 npn

The Sumi and Sangtam at Shishimi village un-der Kiphire District were living together as one socially, politically, religiously etc etc., since last 60-70 years under one administration. Many inter-marriages between the two communities have taken place since the time of our forefathers.

However, on 11th Jan. ’07 the Sangtam Students’ dissociated from Sumi Students Union and attended USSC annual conference at Sangphor Village, and on 29th Dec. 07 established themselves as ‘Singsi Local Students’ Union’. Further, on 1st Jan, ’08 one Tsaseo Sangtam, GB and Shikuto Sangtam, GB made a declaration that henceforth, Sumi & Sangtam shall live as Sumi & Sangtam shall live separately as two tribes socially, politically, religiously etc etc., which created more confusion in the minds of Sumi and therefore we (Sumis) convened a joint general meeting on 17th Jan ’08 to amicably resolve the issue had there been any. But unfortunately only three GB’s from their (Sangtam) side attended the meeting. However, they left the meeting without even trying to resolve the issue therefore, according to their (Sangtam) declaration, Sumi decided to have a separate fellowship.

Then, on 18th Jan. ’08 one Shitoyi Sangtam, GB Shishimi (Singsi) had informed one Tungseli who was at Kiphire over the phone that clashes had taken placed between Sumi & Sangtam at the Viliage although there was no such incident. Again on the same day they had removed all the firewood and stones (boulders) in and around the Church compound and shifted elsewhere. On 19th Jan’08 when Sumi were about to have evening fellowship (service) in the Church as decided earlier, the Sangtams mostly comprising of matured and active male and females joined in accusing and intimidating us (Sumis). However, on sensing unwanted situation, we (Sumis) tried to calm them and appealed not to defile the sanctity of the Church but in spite of our request, one Late. Seopi Sangtam started beating one Toshiyi Sumi, and then Ghozheli Sangtam & Niqheli Sangtam took out the pieces of CGI pipe which they brought hiding inside their shawl and started banging Toshiyi & Vikato. Again Toyili W/O Tsaseo started throwing chilly powder on the faces of Alhoshe, Khekato & Abel. All those incident took place inside the Church sensing more danger, we (Sumis) started fleeing for our lives jumping over the window, but to our surprise the Sangtams mostly youth with the following objects as their weapons surrounded us and started beating the Sumis.

The objects they used as weapons were chiliy powder, CGI pipe pieces, knives, Airgun barrels clubbed with nails, 3×4 timber, bore gun etc etc.

While fleeing for our lives Tsaseo GB DB knocked down Lotoli with piece of CGI pipe and as Samuel Sumi tried to pacify, he was also knocked down by Alipa & Aheyi Sangtam with a club fixed with nails then followed banging and knocking down Sumis by the Sangtam womenfolk’s with the said objects supplied by Khetoli W/O Obed Sangtam, a Pastor with Tsaseo attempting to fire at the Sumis, however, Ghokhuzhe Sumi somehow managed to snatch the gun. In the meantime, Ahoto Sangtam stabbed Abel Sumi VG 2 I/c and acting Pastor Shishimi, repeatedly over the latter’s head, yet he did retaliate. The Sangtams armed with said objects attempted to massacre Sumi’s in a pre-planned manner as the above statement clearly indicates. And in the process of attacking Sumi’s by the Sangtam mob, they themselves have beaten and thrashed to death Late. Seopi Sangtam and injured several others, perhaps on mistaken identity, as all the Sumis were fleeing for their lives even as Samuel who was badly injured on his head was rushing to Siti town to inform the Viliage Guards of the incident, met up with Sepichem Sangtarn S/o Tsaseo GB, but did not do any harm on him rather gave a lift and safely dropped him at Siti Town by the formers vehicle.

Khekhato V. Aye, Chairman, Sumi Community, Shishimi Village.


Unification process inclusive of all Nagas

27th Jan.2008 NPN

Persisting insistence on National principle as the basis of unification is indeed convincing. The desire and longing of Naga people to unite, stop fratricides and mindless killings among the Nagas and to take forward peace process and peaceful dialogue with the Government of India in itself is the interest of all the Nagas. If unity of the Nagas is to be dubbed as anti-national and against the principle of the Nagas, does it opine that bloodshed and killings is the Naga national principle?

The past efforts to usher in peace and unity among the Nagas by apex Naga bodies have been in vain due to dictated national principle. The professed national principle under the conditions that Nagas from other camps should unconditionally surrender to the I-M camp could not be accepted by the rest and thus, all peace initiatives were fractured. Illusive proclamations of national amnesty, peace, reconciliation and unity tainted by cold blooded fratricides, threats and intimidations to Naga leaders abiding by their so-called national principle prevailed.

Taking into account of the senseless killings in the name of nationalism and a need to end the carnage the Nagaland GBs and DBs forum, Sumi Hoho and Western Sumi Hoho with the consultation and consent of Chairmen Isak Chishi Swu, S.S. Khaplang and Brig. (Retd) Singya, Naga Hoho, ENPO, NBCC and federating churches, the ongoing unification process renewed with further momentum.

Subsequently, this initiative was received with wide participation, applaud and support from public bodies like (to name few) Eastern Naga Students’ Federation, Youth Association of Nagai, Chakhesang Public Organisation, Naga Mothers Association, Kuki National Organisation, Konyak Union, Yimchunger Tribal Council, Southern Naga Union of Nagaland State, Kuki Inpi Nagaland, Eastern Naga National Workers Association, Rights watchdog Senepati so on and so forth.

After prolonged internecine confrontations, the Nagas have finally been relieved from the path of self-destruction.

However, the anti-unification forces have all along been trying to incite sectarianism to derail peace and unification process against the wishes of the Nagas.

Regardless of such forces at work, it is highly commendable that the bold step taken by the peace initiators has created a historical landmark thus halting killings and bloodsheds.

Accordingly, without any imposed conditions and in response to the clarion call of the Nagas for unification and reconciliation, the leaders and workers from two NSCN and NNC/FGN unified and are striving further and harder to ensure total unification of all the Nagas across party, artificial imposed boundaries or differences.

As a result of ongoing unification effort, killings and bloodsheds have been stopped except for principled killings by anti-unification forces in the name of national principle.

To set the record straight, our national principle is based on broad-based support and participation of the Nagas and thus it is our bounden duty to respect and reciprocate the desire of the Nagas to unite and peacefully pursue our common goal.

It is thus transparent, that, the ongoing unification process is inclusive of all the Nagas and is guided by the spirit of national unity and reconciliation.

Publicity Cell,



Naga unification, a sensitive issue: NSCN (IM)

26th Jan.2008 NPN

Personality matters in carrying a weight of national movement. Sixty (60) years of Naga resistance against the mighty armed forces of India is a matter of national personality built over defending the national principle. For the charismatic leadership of Isak Chishi Swu, Khodao Yanthan and Th. Muivah the principle that guided the Naga movement survived and refused to be cowed down, much to the chagrin of the government of India. The question of how to bring all the different groups under one banner is a serious question. It is not as easy as some civil societies think. The recent experience of Western Sumi Hoho and Sumi Hoho is a pointer to the fact that Naga unification is a sensitive issue and when handled the wrong way they will face brickbat and thrown out of the scene with their finger burnt, because no one can make rough-shod of the national principle while initiating Naga unification. The history of the national movement cannot be cut short just to fulfill the interest of certain sectarian group.

As presented by the group behind the flopped unification effort, the unification initiative is not a new thing for the Nagas. It is not a matter of somebody in the person of NSCN General Secretary Th. Muivah standing as a stumbling block. The issue was honouring the national principle in order to pursue the unification agenda. The issue of sixty years standing to be discussed by sidelining the national principle is unthinkable. Unification at the cost of our avowed principle is totally incomprehensible. This is all about the reason why the past records show failure after failure. There are many among the Nagas who came with a serious meaning to face the reality of Naga unification. But when encountered on the crucial question of defending the principle they showed their true colour.

In defense of national principle, how many can be counted as worthy national worker willing to drop their allegiance to the Indian security forces for conducting covert operation against NSCN and how many are willing to work in the true spirit of Naga integration under Nagalim. How many are willing to stop spitting venom of tribal line. How many are willing to depart from their alliance with Meiteis and some Kuki groups who are deadly against Naga unity and Naga – Kuki unity. And most of all how many are willing to resist the persistent effort of the government of India to pressurize the Nagas to seek solution under the Indian constitution. The prize of sixty years resistant and a lost of over 2,50,000 (two lacs fifty thousand) persons cannot be compromised for a prize that does not match our historical value.



Venomous attack on communal line by unification forces-

24th Jan. 2008 NPN

To the Nagas, unification call has come as a cruel deception, because in the name of Naga unification the forces behind the unification initiative never speak the language of unification other than uttering venomous attack on communal line. That was the beginning of the downfall and the premature damnation of the false preachers of unification. Because the Nagas are no longer naïve to be fooled by such sweet sounding slogan of Naga unification without finding any reflection in the ground reality. The ground reality shows nothing more than parochialism and communalism, and that too in a very belligerent manner. But the Nagas are no fool, not to question the hypocrisy and the diabolic program behind the façade of Naga unification. Because as much as the communal sentiments the forces behind the unification have, the greater is the national sentiments of the Nagas who voiced their stand against unification on communal line and away from the concept of Nagalim. This is the crux of the issue. Otherwise, there is no single group of Nagas who is against Naga unification. This also goes to show that for the love of Nagalim, the Nagas are so obsessed with unification. But for the wrong approach or exploitation of this obsession, this sensitive national agenda remains elusive.

Motivated by the spirit of goodness for the society they represent there is no reason why Nagas civil societies like Naga Hoho, ENPO, NBCC, Nagaland GBs and DBs forum including the Sumi Hoho should not be obsessed with Naga unification if carried out in good spirit. Nagas should never undermine the role of these civil societies and NSCN attached special place of importance to them because people’s movement should respect people’s representative bodies. But one should not go to the extent of misguiding them on such issue of national magnitude. Tracking their names in the wrong course will only boomerang in due course of time.

There is no denying of the fact about the Nagas having suffered enough in the post many years. But the pain and hardship does not mean selling our right and making a mockery of our principle. The Nagas have earned respect and honor in the national and international for tenaciously defending the Naga national principle.


Issued by: MIP/GPRN, NSCN (IM)

Nagas reconciliation and unification-

24th Jan. 2008 NPN

The ongoing unification move is the renewal and continuing process of series of such moves that were stagnated earlier for one reason or the other.

The present imitative is not a culmination of a particular event or incident as detractors in certain camp are trying to portray for reason best known, but in line with earlier efforts and with mandated authority of the Naga people, the Naga Hoho, ENPO, Churches (NBCC), respective tribal Hohos, the Chairmen of NSCN, Isak Swu and S.S Khaplang and NNC/FGN Kedage, Brig. (Rtd.) Singya.

To ascertain and clarify what, who and why? caused failure of not only earlier unification moves but also desperately trying to curtail the present initiative, let us dwell on facts and figures pertinent to this issue.

During 1996-97 the Sumi Hoho, Tangkhul Long and Konyak union initiated the Naga unification and later in the year 1999 the two NSCN in principle agreed to unify, in pursuance of this, the three tribal Hohos took necessary steps and met leaders from all the groups and were responded with positive note Muivah expressed his opinion on unification move saying-“We recognize unification move and we shall agree to accept the proposal of merger but no condition should be imposed”.

In the month of May and August 2000, Isak Swu and Muivah deputed their emissaries and after series of joint consultations with counterparts, Zunheboto town was declared “Peace Zone” with the same effort to be pursued in all parts of Naga country. The move gained significant momentum and was supported by all sections of the Nagas including collective leaders of both the NSCN groups. Had this peace deal not been undermined later by Muivah, Nagas would have been unified by then. Without any valid reason Muivah unilaterally nullified the deal. The Nagas were shocked and dismayed and blood of the Nagas once again continued to flow in the land.

In the year 2004, Naga unification was renewed jointly through the initiative of Sumi Hoho, Konyak Union and Tangkhul Long, while the move was on the verge of success, V. S. Atem, emissary of IM collective leaders on order from Muivah forged a signature of Isak Swu and dispatched a letter asking Gen. Kholi, the Army Chief of NSCN to desert his camp and surrender immediately to IM camp, Naga unification was thus scuttled once again by Muivah and V.S. Atem and blood shed continued.

After an interval of two years, peace deal was reached between two NSCN groups at Zunheboto on May 29′ 2006. Like earlier agreement Zunheboto was again declared “Peace Zone” with approval from both the respective Chairmen of NSCN.

Most appallingly, in less than a month IM cadres attacked the People’s Army stationed at Sutemi village under Zunheboto district, killed one and injured one. Muivah justified the attack saying that the agreement was without his consent and demoted Shikato Chishi the then Dy. Kilonser (Home) regardless of the fact that Shikato Chishi was officially authorized by Isak Swu at Bangkok and later endorsed by National Security Council to append the agreement. Since then, killings and bloodshed loomed its ugly head in the Naga country until the renewal of the present unification effort.

Despite road blocks to Naga unification process at various stages by anti-Naga elements and mostly at the behest of anti-National activists at Hebron, the Nagas in general and true national workers in particular were never deterred from peaceful pursuit of peace and unification among the Nagas Irrespective of party affiliations or artificial boundaries.

Thus far, Naga unification despite numerous hurdles cannot be sidelined or overlooked if Nagas are to achieve political settlement for Naga unification and political settlement are two in-separable components. The immediate factor that accelerated the present unification process is attributed to Isak Swu’s National proclamation for peace and reconciliation at Hebron on January 13′ 2007 followed by three days prayer fasting with Sumi churches comprising of SBAK’S, WSBAK, SABAK on August 21′ 2007 where Isak Swu appealed to the Sumis to unify and pave way for unification of all the Nagas at large. Following this clarion call of Isak Swu, joint session of Sumi National workers comprising of both the civil and military officials was held on September 17′ 2007 and the Sumis further re-affirmed to take forward the call of the Nagas for unification.

It is thus clear that the current Naga unification is being pursued with proper authorization and mandate of not only the Nagas at large but with consent of Isak Swu and S. S. Khaplang.

To further augment unification of all the Nagas across party, group or boundaries, GPRN/NSCN and NNC/FGN signed MOD on January 11′ 2008 at Vihokhu and affirmed to take forward on going unification process concertedly.

Earlier, Cease-fire agreement for six months between NSCN and 1M was signed on anuary7′ 2008 at Kohima and was witnessed by Nagaland GBs and DBs forum, whereby it was agreed to cease any form of hostilities or killing in Nagaland between the two groups.

However on January 14′ 2008 IM cadres in a blatant violation of Ceasefire Agreement, abducted three GPRN/NSCN workers namely Capt. Imliyanger, RCM Imnasangba and Rajapeyu Temsusashi and killed them in cold blooded at Longmisa under Mokokchung District.

As usual, these anti-Naga activists is averse to Naga unification and thus resorting to every possible tirade of accusation and provocative senseless killings of Nag a National workers, even as the Nagas call for unification is being heralded on the rooftop of every Naga home and hearth.

We question thus, is killing and bloodshed the National principle or the front door policy for Naga unification as being advocated by anti-unification group? Could there be solution to our struggle without reconciliation and unification? How longer should the Nagas succumb to the dictates of such forces that bestow killings, bloodsheds, hatred, divisions and destruction among the Nagas? In union, let us defeat anti-unification forces and build our Nation on the basis of brotherhood, love, respect, forgiveness and reconciliation. Let us not pass on to the posterity, the legacy of killings and bloodsheds.


Publicity Cell